Setting The Record Straight: “Abuser Fees”

Apparently, there is some person who, either incompetently or maliciously, made up an e-mail trying to make people think that there is some kind of surcharge (known as “Civil Remedial Fees” or “Abuser Fees”) being put on speeding tickets beginning July 1.

If you got that e-mail, it cited a “” article claiming there is a “new law.”  The problem is that the original e-mail author did not actually take time to look at the article he was forwarding.  If he did, he would have noticed that it is from three years ago.  I have received a lot of inquiries.  Here is my general response:

1.  The article cited is from 2007.

2.  This person should be writing to reps in NJ, TX and MI which all have this law.

3.  The law was repealed three years ago.

4.  I voted for the repeal.  When I started working on this concept 6 years ago, it seemed like a good idea because many other states are doing it with no controversy.  And, from 2004 to the date it was passed in 2007, I received only one call complaining about it.  The concept was to make people who commit criminal violations on the roads pay more to upkeep the roads than those of us who just get a traffic ticket every year or so.  As you can tell from the height of the grass in the medians, there is no money for road maintenance.  And no one seems to want a tax increase.  So, I thought that since other states are doing this without controversy, maybe it would be a good idea for us.  But after it went into effect, a lot of people did not like it.  My job is not to do what I want, but to do what my constituents want, so I voted to repeal it.  All money charged was refunded.  I am not perfect – just trying my best in very difficult circumstances.  All I can say is that unlike most politicians, I at least “man up” to it and admit when I made a mistake.

5.  Fifth, no mere traffic tickets were ever charged one penny under the short time the law was in effect.  The article cited by this person incorrectly stated the law to begin with.  It stated that there was a “$3,500 speeding ticket.”  No speeding tickets were ever charged a dime.  The offense had to rise to the level of a Misdemeanor crime (e.g DUI, Reckless Speeding, Vehicular Manslaughter …)  so the fine/fee charged was the least of people’s worries.  People should have been more concerned about getting a criminal record more than the fee.   As for a $3,500 fee/fine?  $3,000 was if you killed someone.  But the article just happens to leave that small detail out.

6.  Typical unaccountable internet rumors that mislead people.

7.  Oh, and the part about benefiting me?  Raising punishments on activities lowers the occurrence of the activity.  That is why we raise penalties on bank robbery, so that people won’t do it.  When the “Abuser Fee” law was in effect for its brief 7 month life span, Reckless Driving charges went down, and my firm, along with every other law firm, actually had less people calling them for representation, and thus, made less money.  And according to the State Police stats, as soon as the Abuser Fees were repealed, people went back to driving insanely.  Surprisingly, they did not have any effect drunk drivers.  Apparently, drunks don’t care what the punishment is, they just keep doing it.



3 responses to “Setting The Record Straight: “Abuser Fees”

  1. Majority of accidents are caused by the drunk drivers firstly still. Police do not regularly, actively, year around purse them and why? More people die from alcohol, drugs, hospital neglect, and yet more money is being paid on catching mainly the speeders.. Police do not mind harassing still the ordinary folks with revenue generating traffic, parking, speeding tickets though

  2. In response to the above comment – be realistic. You can’t have thousands of miles of paved roads for free. Speeding tickets generate needed revenue. So do the fines obtained from DUI arrests. Statistically, there are just a lot more speeders than drunk drivers. If you don’t want to contribute, slow down.
    In response to the bill that was repealed in 2008, yes, other states have similar laws. Similar. The difference was that those states don’t single out residents of their own state. That was a bit too much for most Virginians to swallow. You can’t please all the people all of the time, especially when you don’t treat all of the people in the same manner.

  3. Mr. Non-conformer:While drunks kill a lot of people, about one a day in VA, other accidents result in more deaths. I’m not sure how many are from speeding, texting, carelessness or are just unavoidable. I think the police should have those statistics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s